Godfrey Miller (Godfrey Clive Miller) (1893-1964)
Slade figure study
of a male torso, c. 1930–34
Stamped with
John Henshaw’s studio stamp of Godfrey Miller’s estate and numbered “S113”
Pencil on buff
coloured paper
Size: (image
within the window mount) 19 x 8.2 cm; (frame) 49 x 35.4 cm.
Condition: the
sheet is trimmed irregularly at the top edge; the timber frame is unvarnished
and has minor signs of its age (i.e. yellow oxidisation, insect specks and
dustiness) and the backing sheet should be replaced.
I am selling
this very early and rare drawing (in the sense that Miller destroyed/culled
most of his early drawings) for AU$1200 including postage and handling to anywhere
in the world.
If you are
interested in purchasing this original and very early drawing by one of
Australia’s most famous artists, please contact me
(oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com) and I will send you a PayPal invoice to make
the payment easy.
(Note that this
photo has reflections that are not a part of the drawing)
For me this
life class study of a male nude has slight overtones of androgyny and I had to
think hard why this is so.
The first
reason that sprung to mind is that Miller has erased the arms, legs and face of
the figure: arguably, a masculine way of looking at attractive females.
There is also
the curious failure to draw the genitals: a missing feature that is possibly a
symptom of the age of censure from which this drawing arose rather than a
delight in castration.
The third
reason has to do with the sensitive treatment of the contrapposto pose (i.e.
the S-shaped rhythm passing through the figure) in that, Miller seems to
lovingly/tentatively/softly stroke the edges of forms rather than using
emphatic/manly/unambiguous marks to portray him. (My sincere apologies if any
of the above descriptions of gender attributes are inaccurate or too sweeping
in their categorisations.)
Aaah ... I've finally figured out the reason about the androgyny of this drawing: the portrayed chap has a man's navel (i.e. horizontal rather than vertical like a woman) but a woman's hips ... forgetting about his manly chest of course.
ReplyDelete