Jules Jacquemart (aka Jules Ferdinand Jacquemart) (1837–80)
“Plate 53: Gobelet
de Sardoine Oriental”, 1865, from the series “Gemmes et Joyaux de la Couronne
au Musée du Louvre”, printed by Auguste Delâtre (1822–1907) and published by Henry
Barbet de Jouy.
Etching with
plate/surface tone on laid paper with full margins (as published).
Size: (sheet) 54.5
x 37.5 cm; (plate) 38.7 x 28.4 cm; (image borderline) 34.4 x 24.3 cm
Inscribed
within the image (lower centre) “Jules Jacquemart delin. et Sculpt.”
Lettered above
the image (upper left corner) “PL. 53”; (upper centre) “MUSÉE DU LOUVRE.”
Lettered below
the image (centre) “Imp. Delȃtre, Paris.”
To see the
complete series see Elizabeth Legge gallery: http://www.leggeprints.com/jacquemart/index.htm
Condition: large,
flawless impression in near pristine condition (i.e. there are no tears, holes,
abrasions, folds or foxing, but there are a couple of small spots) with generous
margins.
I am selling
this remarkable illustration of a goblet from the Louvre collection for AU$118
(currently US$90.59/EUR82.84/GBP74.13 at the time of this listing) including
postage and handling to anywhere in the world. If you are interested in
purchasing this large etching of the highest order of technical skill, please
contact me (oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com) and I will send you a PayPal
invoice to make the payment easy.
Sometimes
masterpieces of the highest order of technical skill are created with the very
simple goal: to illustrate other artworks. Such is the case with this magnificent
etching representing a gold and precious stone goblet from the Louvre Museum
collection.
Jacquemart is
the acknowledged master of the art of reproductive illustration and this
perception of his skills is borne out by one of the great connoisseurs of the
late 19th and early 20th centuries, Henri Beraldi, who
asserts that Jacquemart is “one of the most astonishing etchers of his time and
of all times.” In FL Leipnik’s (1924) “A History of French Etching” Beraldi is purported
to say that “Jacquemart was the creator of a new ‘genre,’ the rendering of
objects of art.” (p. 117). Of course, Jacquemart was not the first to render still-life curios, but as Leipnik points out: “he was certainly the first to
portray that aspect of the surface-texture of curios which one may be permitted
to call the reflection of the soul of the inanimate object” (ibid).
Leipnik’s
notion that Jacquemart could capture the aura of inanimate objects may be a
little farfetched, nevertheless, there are very few etchers that have the
supreme technical skills of Jacquemart to visually communicate the physical
attributes of the different surfaces represented.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please let me know your thoughts, advice about inaccuracies (including typos) and additional information that you would like to add to any post.