Herman van Swanevelt (aka Herman Swaneveld) (1603–55)
“Large
Waterfall” [La Grande Cascade], 1620–1655, from the series “Four Upright
Landscapes”
Etching on tan
wove paper trimmed within the platemark.
Size: (sheet) 30.7
x 23.7 cm
Inscribed below
the image borderline: (left) “Herman van Swanevelt Inventor fecit”; (right) “cum
privilegio Regis”
Bartsch ll.114
(318.115)
Condition: good
impression from a late edition trimmed within the platemark.
I am selling
this original etching by Swanevelt for a total cost of AU$310 (currently US$226.60/EUR214.71/GBP183.61
at the time of this listing) including postage and handling to anywhere in the
world.
If you are
interested in purchasing this magnificent print, please contact me
(oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com) and I will send you a PayPal invoice to make
the payment easy.
Herman van Swanevelt (aka Herman Swaneveld) (1603–55)
“The Mountain”
[La Montagne], 1620–1655,
from the series “Four Upright Landscapes”
Etching on laid
paper with margins
Size: (sheet) 35.9
x 27.7 cm; (plate); 31.5 x 24.4 cm
The British
Museum offers the following description of this print (in the third state):
“The Mountain.
Landscape with two travellers in lower left, standing next to a wild stream
filled with large rocks which runs along a tall rockface at right, a muleteer
on a road halfway up the cliff at top right, from a series of four landscapes”
Inscribed below
the image borderline: (left) “Herman van Swanevelt Inventor fecit”; (right) “cum
privilegio Regis”
Bartsch ll.113
(317)
Condition: good
impression with generous margins. The sheet has age toning, light folds, area
of thinning and a closed tear at the lower edge, but is otherwise in good
condition.
This print has
been sold.
Herman van Swanevelt (aka Herman Swaneveld) (1603–55)
“A Group of
Trees” [La bouquet d’arbres], 1620–1655, from the series “Four Upright
Landscapes”
Etching on laid
paper with margins
Size: (sheet) 39.1
x 28.3 cm; (plate); 31.2 x 24.1 cm
Inscribed below
the image borderline: (left) “Herman van Swanevelt Inventor fecit”; (right) “Paris
chez Vanheck / [partly erased text …] cum privilegio Regis”
The British
Museum offers the following description of this print:
“A group of
trees; growing on a rocky mound at centre; two travellers in conversation as
they pass each other on the country road at left; two male figures with a mule
further along the same road in middle distance; in right foreground a male
figure kneeling to drink from a stream; from a series of four landscapes.” (http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1631153&partId=1&people=105987&peoA=105987-2-60&page=1)
Hollstein
102.ll; Bartsch ll.115 (318)
Condition: very
good impression with generous margins in excellent condition (for its age). The
sheet has light age-toning towards the edges and ink notes from a previous
collector (verso) and remnants of mounting hinges.
This print has
been sold.
________________
These vertical
landscapes by Swanevelt are designed to be awe inspiring. I mean this in the sense
that the scale of each landscape makes the portrayed folk going about their
everyday business seem very small. Moreover, the elevated outlook offered in each
scene invites viewers to contemplate the vastness of nature from a grand
perspective—some writers might even describe the viewpoint as “God’s
perspective.”
Swanevelt was
far from being alone in his quest to capture the essence of landscape.
Indeed, one of his close associates at the time is the legendary Claude Lorrain
(born Claude Gellée) (1604/5?–82). There is a considerable difference, however,
between Swanevelt’s and Lorrain’s approaches to portraying landscape. Both shared
the conception of landscape as an idyllic place populated with classical
personages, but the fundamental differences are all
about how the portrayed landscapes are structured and illuminated.
Swanevelt structured
his landscape as if he were a set designer for the stage. Each pictorial
element—tree, rocky outcrop, twist in a river, mountain—is treated like a stage
flat in which the silhouette edge of the various landscape features mark distinct spatial zones. By contrast, Lorrain’s landscapes are far more pictorially
homogenised in the sense of being structured with greater ease in the
transition from one spatial zone to the next.
In terms of how
light is used, Swanevelt leans strongly towards raked lighting (i.e. an extreme angle of side lighting). This approach
presents trees and rocks as if illuminated at early morning or late evening
where forms appear solid and almost impenetrably opaque. By contrast, Lorrain
employs a broader and more general lighting and when he does use strong light, the
light seems to penetrate through forms.
(I apologise
for generalising about Swanevelt and Lorrain but I find that speaking broadly is
helpful to “get to the heart” of an issue.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please let me know your thoughts, advice about inaccuracies (including typos) and additional information that you would like to add to any post.