Jacques Callot (1592– 1635)
“The Ponte
Vecchio in Florence”, c.1621, from the series of fifty plates, “Capricci di
varie figure di Iacopo Callot—The Nancy set”
Etching on fine
laid paper with margins lined onto a conservator’s support sheet.
Size: (sheet)
10.3 x 12.8 cm; (plate) 6 x 8.4 cm; (image borderline) 5.5 x 8 cm
Meaume 1860
781.I (Meaume, Édouard 1860, “Recherches sur la vie et les ouvrages de Jacques
Callot”, 2 volumes, Paris); Lieure 1927 434.I (Lieure, J, 1927. “Jacques
Callot”, 3 vols, Paris, Editions de la Gazette des Beaux-Arts)
The British
Museum offers the following description of this print:
“Side view of
the Ponte Vecchio in Florence, with men bathing in the river; reclining nude
figure in the foreground, on the left c.1621 Etching”
Condition: crisp
impression from a slightly worn plate (?) with a printer’s mark on the lower left
edge, generous margins (approx. 2 cm). The very fine sheet of laid paper is in
excellent condition and lined onto a conservator’s support of washi paper.
I am selling
this VERY small etching, with all the careful attention to making swelling
lines that made Callot famous, for AU$210 (currently US$157.90/EUR146.90/GBP123.29
at the time of this listing) including postage and handling to anywhere in the
world.
If you are
interested in purchasing this small miracle of etching, please contact me
(oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com) and I will send you a PayPal invoice to make
the payment easy.
Interestingly,
there are two marginally different versions of this very small plate that are
both executed by Callot: c.1617 and c.1621. This impression is from the later (c.1621)
version and a copy of the earlier (c.1617) version is available to be seen at
the British Museum: http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1556566&partId=1&searchText=callot+ponte+vecchio&people=130293&page=1.
Although the differences between the two plates may seem at a cursory glance somewhat
trivial (for instance there is more detail to be seen in the distance shown
under the arch of the bridge in the first version and the dark toning of the
sky is more refined/less bumpy in the second version) the changes that Callot
made do affect the meaning expressed. From my standpoint, the c.1617 version
presents the view of the bridge—the Ponte Vecchio—as a closely observed
representation of its structure with an earthy show of naked chaps frolicking in
the water below it. By contrast, the c.1621 version shown here, presents the
scene bathed in light and air. The chaps are still "doing their thing" in the Arno, but the
mood is no longer about the everyday world of the here and now. What I see expressed is a more
sublime and spiritual feeling of quiet liberation captured by the reclining
nude on the lower left corner.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please let me know your thoughts, advice about inaccuracies (including typos) and additional information that you would like to add to any post.