Balthasar
Moncornet (1600–68)
“Lucas van Leyden at the Age of 39”, c1640, after a self-portrait
by van Leyden (1494–1533), published by Balthasar Moncornet as inscribed on the
plate.
Engraving on laid paper with minute ink notations by an old hand
in the two lower corners.
Size: (sheet) 18.1 x 13.9 cm; (plate) 15.7 x 11.5 cm
Inscribed with three lines of descriptive Latin text about van
Leyden followed by publication details and privilege (copyright) details: “B.
Moncornet excudit, Avec privilege du Roy.”
Van Someren 3353
Condition: richly inked and crisp impression with margins. The
sheet is in very good condition (i.e. there are no tears, holes, folds,
abrasions or significant stains) with minor age-toning and a few spots of light
foxing.
I am selling this fascinating and well-executed early engraving of
the great German printmaker’s self-portrait for [deleted] at the time of this listing) including postage and handling to anywhere in the
world.
If you are interested in purchasing this splendid example of the
engraver’s art from the mid 17th century, please contact me
(oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com) and I will send you a PayPal invoice to make
the payment easy.
This print has been sold
When artists draw themselves in a mirror a curious phenomenon
occurs: their pupils dilate (i.e. the black dot in the centre of the eye becomes bigger than usual). This phenomenon tends not to occur when artists take a “selfie” photograph. Consequently, drawn or painted
self-portraits evolved from artists studying themselves in mirrors will always
be different to those executed from photographs.
What I love about this engraving is not only that van Leyden’s pupils are
clearly dilated, but there is another attribute that only great masters know
about: the principle of ensuring that the two eyes are different. Or to express
this in a different way: great artists know that one eye must be dominant over
the other and that poor portraits allow both eyes to compete for our attention.
One interesting principle that illustrators sometimes employ is to use a
squared reflection in the dominant eye and a round reflection in the other. In
this portrait, the reflections are different even though the technique employed
is more about changing the size and tone of the strong and weaker eyes. As a
result, van Leyden’s “intuitive” eye (on our left) looks kindly towards us
while his “analytical” eye (on our right) studies us with sharp pragmatic intelligence.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please let me know your thoughts, advice about inaccuracies (including typos) and additional information that you would like to add to any post.