Paulus
Pontius (aka Paulus du Pont) (1603–1658)
“Raphael de Urbin”, 1630–40, after Raphael’s “The Czartoryski
Raphael” (arguably a self-portrait; see Hasan Niyazi’s scholarly and important article
about this portrait—“an iconic victim of Nazi art looting”: http://www.3pp.website/2012/08/the-czartoryski-raphael.html),
published by Paulus Pontius, Antwerp
Engraving on fine laid paper lined onto a support sheet.
Size: (sheet trimmed unevenly) 26.2 x 19.1 cm; (plate) 25.8 x 18.2
cm; (image borderline) 22.5 x 17.4 cm
State ii (of iv) My attribution of the impression to this state is
based on the publication details and the image itself matching the 2nd
state impression held by the BM and Harvard.
Hollstein 115.II; Mauquoy-Hendrickx 1991 162 (Marie Mauquoy-Hendrickx
1991, “L'Iconographie d'Antoine Van Dyck”, Catalogue raisonné, 2 vols,
Brussels, Bibliotheque Royale Albert Ier); New Hollstein (Dutch & Flemish)
494.II (Van Dyck)
The British Museum offers the following description of this print:
“Portrait of Raphael, half-length to right, wearing a beret; after
his self-portrait.”
See also the technical details offered by the Harvard Museum: https://www.harvardartmuseums.org/collections/object/277800?position=1
Condition: marvellously crisp impression but with tears to the
margins and uneven trimming. The sheet has been laid onto a support of fine
washi paper to address these issues. There are also (almost invisible) spot
restorations of small abrasions.
I am selling this masterpiece by one of the most important engravers
of the Renaissance for the total cost of AU$190 (currently US$148.46/EUR126.41/GBP112.64
at the time of this listing) including postage and handling to anywhere in the
world.
If you are interested in purchasing this seldom seen
engraving that is very likely a portrait of Raphael—certainly Pontius thought
that it was hence the inscribed title—please contact me (oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com)
and I will send you a PayPal invoice to make the payment easy.
This print has been sold
As a student I used to look at what I was told was a self-portrait
of Raphael featured in his fresco, “The School of Athens.” In this enormous
painting this so-called self-portrait of Raphael is shown in the guise of the
legendary painter from antiquity, Apelles. Equally interesting to me at this time
was that I was also told that Raphael’s true love in life is shown on the far
left of the scene in the guise of the great Alexandrian female scholar, Hypatia.
I must admit that my view of Raphael as a student was that he looked like a
chap that could not catch a ball—perhaps closer to a chap that DEFINITELY could
not catch a ball even if it were thrown underarm towards him. Moreover, my perception
of the “love of his life”—and of course I could be very wrong—was the she was type
of sensible lady who would only wear comfortable shoes.
What I find interesting in light of my early assessment is that
when I examine this portrait of him by Pontius I feel that my early thoughts
were close to the truth. I tend to agree with those who believe that this is
not really a portrait of a man at all because of one seemingly trivial but
probably important fact: he lacks an Adam’s apple—the laryngeal
prominence—in the neck.
For those interested in this portrait I strongly recommend reading
Hasan Niyazi’s (2012) highly informative article, “The Czartoryski Raphael”: http://www.3pp.website/2012/08/the-czartoryski-raphael.html
I need to do a school work about Rapahel and I'm still deciding what image I should put on the cover, is the man represented in the drawing Rapahael? Just to clear things out.
ReplyDeleteThere are arguments both ways in terms of whether the portrayed sitter is Raphael or not. If you choose to claim that it is of Raphael you certainly have a long history of claims that it is the master. If you want my opinion, however, it isn’t ... based on my discussion above.
Delete