Simon
Frisius (aka Simon Wynhoutsz Frisius; Simon de Vries) (c.1580–1628)
“Landscape with a Windmill”, 1614, after Matthijs Bril (c.1550–83), published by Hendrick Hondius I
(1573–1650) in “Topographia Variarum Regionum” (Various topographical views)
(1613/14).
See this publication at the Rijksmuseum: http://hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.453679
Note: the Rijksmuseum seems to have made an error by describing
this print as after the design of Josse van Liere (1500/20–1583) (see RP-P-1885-A-8900).
Van Liere’s name is not mentioned in the BM’s description of the print (see 1947,0319.7.19)
and only Bril’s name is lettered in the publication details on the plate. Nevertheless,
Van Liere did design at least one other print in the series.
Etching on fine paper (presumably laid paper as this is a first
state impression, but the chainlines are not evident—perhaps an Oriental paper
as was sometimes employed by Rembrandt?) trimmed irregularly at or within the
image borderline and lined with a support sheet.
Lettered on plate below the image borderline: “'Mathias bril. Inventor.
Hhondius excudit.”
Size: (sheet) 10 x 15.5 cm
State i (of ii) before the addition of the plate number signifying
the second state (see the second state impression held by the Rijksmuseum: item
no. RP-P-1885-A-8900).
Hollstein 1-25 (after Matthijs Bril); New Hollstein (Dutch &
Flemish) 149.I (Simon Frisius); Hollstein 64-91 (under Simon Frisius)
The Rijksmuseum offers the following description of this print:
“Hilly landscape with a windmill. In the foreground a man with two
packaged donkeys.” (http://hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.113202)
The British Museum offers the following description of this print:
“View of a windmill and figures farming, after Matthijs Bril.” (http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=3052313&partId=1&searchText=windmill&people=103915&page=1)
The curator of the BM advises that the publication “’Topographia
Variarum Regionum’ consists of “a series of twenty-seven etchings by Frisius
after Matthijs Bril (New Hollstein 123-150) of small landscapes, which was
published in 1614 by Hendrick Hondius. One print after Joos van Lier has been
added to the series. The prints are inlaid into double sheets and the series is
bound in an album with a gold tooled vellum binding that seems to be
seventeenth-century.” (http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=3051221&partId=1&searchText=1947,0319.7.&page=1)
Condition: crisp and well-printed lifetime/first state impression,
trimmed irregularly at, or slightly within, the image borderline and backed
with a support sheet of archival (millennium quality) washi paper. The upper-left
corner has been restored as has a small section of the cloud, otherwise the
sheet is in excellent condition.
I am selling this small but remarkable etching for the total cost
of AU$242 (currently US$183.33/EUR150.68/GBP131.36 at the time of posting this)
including postage and handling to anywhere in the world.
If you are interested in purchasing this seldom seen marvellous
old-master print, please contact me (oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com) and I will
send you a PayPal invoice to make the payment easy.
This print has been sold
Frisius’ technical achievements are well documented, such as his skill
in emulating the effect of engraving using only the etched lines in his copy
manuals for student calligraphers (see Clifford S Ackley [1981] in “Printmaking
in the Age of Rembrandt”, p. 48). From a personal standpoint, however, what I
find engaging in looking at Frisius’ landscape prints—and this particular image
is a perfect example—is the artist’s skill in creating very subjective
personal experiences of landscape rather than objective representations.
For example, I see Frisius’ treatment of the clouds as wildly expressive
to the extent that the clouds seem moulded into menacing forms. Note also the
artist’s focus on angled landforms, such as the edge mounds of the road leading
from the foreground and the silhouette edges of the undulating terrain. To my
eyes these angled forms project a feeling of unease as if the angled lines were
an analogue of a troubled mind set against, and complemented by, the horizontal
and vertical lines of the windmill’s sails.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please let me know your thoughts, advice about inaccuracies (including typos) and additional information that you would like to add to any post.